Home    Philosophy    What can we reason but from what we know?

What can we reason but from what we know?

Philosophy, Poetry Comments are closed

An excerpt from An Essay On Man by Alexander Pope, 1734:

—
queensferrylampost220300Say first, of God above or Man below
What can we reason but from what we know?
Of man what see we but his station here,
From which to reason, or to which refer?
Thro’ worlds unnumber’d tho’ the God be known,
‘Tis ours to trace him only in our own.
He who thro’ vast immensity can pierce,
See worlds on worlds compose one universe,
Observe how system into system runs,
What other planets circle other suns,
What varied being peoples every star,
May tell why Heav’n has made us as we are:
But of this frame, the bearings and the ties,
The strong connexions, nice dependencies,
Gradations just, has thy pervading soul
Look’d thro’; or can a part contains the whole?

Is the great chain that draws all to agree,
And drawn supports, upheld by God or thee?

—
On its publication in 1734, An Essay on Man met with great admiration throughout Europe. Voltaire called it “the most beautiful, the most useful, the most sublime didactic poem ever written in any language.” In 1756, Rousseau wrote to Voltaire admiring the poem and saying that it “softens my ills and brings me patience.” Kant was fond of the poem and would recite long passages of the poem to his students. Voltaire later satirized some of Pope’s themes in Candide.

You may also Like

‘Spiritual but not religious’: A Response

The real reason 'spiritual but not religious' is a cop-out. A guest post by Robert Kroese. Recently I ran across a blog post with the title My Take: “I’m spiritual but not religious” is a cop-out. I read the post with interest because I’ve often thought this very thing: that claiming to be “spiritual” isn’t an answer to a question about one’s religious beliefs, but rather a way to avoid the question while sounding like one has put some thought into it.

Book Buzz

The book is out, people are buying it, and apparently some are even reading it! I've heard from readers spread out as disparately as Portland, OR and Washington DC, as well as Turkey and Guatemala. So far only positive feedback, but some crabby, negative reviews are sure to come. That will have to be a separate post! Here's a taste of the great feedback coming in from readers of Pub Theology

Emmanuel | Christmas Day

If you do not hear in the message of Christmas something that must strike some as blasphemy and others as sheer fantasy, the chances are you have not heard the message for what it is. Emmanuel is the message in a nutshell. Emmanuel, which is Hebrew for "God with us." That's where the problem lies.

No Interpretation Needed?

Are you skeptical about biblical interpretation? Does it seem that someone can just "make it say anything?" Are you one of those who would prefer to just "read it for what it says"? You're not alone. Many are intimidated by the vast amount of study some seem to think reading the Bible requires. Can't I just take the "plain sense" of a text and arrive at what God is trying to say to me?

Thumb Drive: DNA to be used for data backups

If you're like me, you're constantly shifting stuff off of your aging laptop onto a hard drive that you hope will last long enough for the day you'll need to access it. What if you could store data on yourself? Like maybe your forearm, or —forehead? The latest in biotech says that may not be a stretch: A team of Harvard and Johns Hopkins geneticists has developed a new method of DNA encoding that makes it possible to store more digital information than ever before.

Close